Question 1

How do gemologists estimate carat weight without a scale?

Accepted Answer

Gemologists use the formula: Length x Width x Depth (in mm) x Specific Gravity x Shape Factor. This gives the "estimated weight" for a mounted stone that cannot be removed for weighing. The specific gravity (density) varies by gem type: diamonds are 3.52, sapphires and rubies are 4.00, and emeralds are 2.72. Shape factors calibrate the formula for different cut profiles: round stones use 0.0018, ovals use 0.0020, and emerald cuts use 0.0025.

Question 2

What are girdle thickness and pavilion bulge adjustments?

Accepted Answer

These are professional appraiser corrections that improve accuracy beyond the basic formula. The girdle is the outer rim of the stone. A thick girdle adds hidden weight (2 to 10% extra) that the basic dimensions do not capture. The pavilion is the bottom cone of the gem. Colored stones like sapphires and rubies are often cut with a deep, rounded belly to enhance color saturation, adding 5 to 10% more weight. Without these adjustments, the basic formula can underestimate carat weight by 5 to 15%.

Question 3

How accurate is this calculator compared to a physical scale?

Accepted Answer

The standard L x W x D x SG x SF formula is accurate to within 5 to 10% for well-proportioned stones. Adding girdle and pavilion corrections narrows this to 2 to 5% accuracy. A calibrated jeweler's scale (accurate to 0.01 ct) is always more precise, but this calculator is invaluable for: estimating mounted stones that cannot be removed, verifying a seller's carat claim before purchase, and appraising loose stones when a scale is unavailable.

Question 4

Why do different shapes have different shape factors?

Accepted Answer

Shape factors compensate for the volume of material removed during cutting. A round brilliant has the most material removed (shape factor 0.0018) because the circular outline wastes more rough stone. An emerald cut retains more material (shape factor 0.0025) due to its rectangular profile. A marquise is the thinnest (0.0016) because its pointed ends contain very little material. These factors are empirically calibrated from thousands of measured stones.

Question 5

Why are sapphires and rubies heavier than diamonds of the same size?

Accepted Answer

Sapphires and rubies (corundum) have a specific gravity of 4.00, while diamonds have 3.52. This means a sapphire of the same dimensions as a diamond weighs approximately 14% more. A 7mm round diamond weighs about 1.25 ct, while a 7mm round sapphire weighs about 1.70 ct. Zircon (SG 4.70) is even denser. This is why you should never estimate a colored stone's weight using diamond weight charts.

Question 6

What is depth percentage and why does it matter?

Accepted Answer

Depth percentage is the depth divided by the average of length and width, expressed as a percentage. For round diamonds, ideal depth is 59 to 62.5%. Shallower stones (under 57%) look larger face-up but may lack brilliance. Deeper stones (over 65%) look smaller face-up but weigh more. Colored stones often have deeper cuts (65 to 75%) to maximize color saturation. Depth percentage helps identify whether a stone is well-proportioned or carrying hidden weight in its depth.

Question 7

Can I use this for mounted stones in jewelry settings?

Accepted Answer

Yes, this is one of the primary use cases. For mounted stones, measure the visible dimensions (length and width) using a millimeter gauge or digital caliper. Estimate the depth based on the setting style: prong settings allow depth measurement from the side, while bezel settings require estimation. For bezel-set stones, assume depth is 60 to 65% of the average of length and width as a starting point. The girdle and bulge adjustments help compensate for estimation uncertainty.

Diameter (mm)	Diamond (3.52)	Sapphire (4.00)	Emerald (2.72)	Amethyst (2.65)
4.0 mm	0.25 ct	0.28 ct	0.19 ct	0.19 ct
5.0 mm	0.50 ct	0.56 ct	0.38 ct	0.37 ct
6.0 mm	0.84 ct	0.96 ct	0.65 ct	0.63 ct
7.0 mm	1.25 ct	1.42 ct	0.97 ct	0.94 ct
8.0 mm	1.82 ct	2.07 ct	1.41 ct	1.37 ct
9.0 mm	2.55 ct	2.90 ct	1.97 ct	1.92 ct
10.0 mm	3.47 ct	3.94 ct	2.68 ct	2.61 ct

Calculadora de Peso em Quilates de Pedras Preciosas

Insira os valores

Resultado

Formula

Exemplo Resolvido

Common Gemstone Sizes and Estimated Carat Weights (Round Cut)

Perguntas Frequentes

Como gemologos estimam o peso sem balanca?

Por que safiras sao mais pesadas que diamantes do mesmo tamanho?

Posso incorporar esta Calculadora de Peso em Quilates de Pedras Preciosas no meu site?

Calculadoras Relacionadas

Related Articles

Agentic ROI Blueprint: Replacing Roles in 2026

Circular TCO vs Circular Savings: Payback Blueprint 2026

GST for AI Freelancers: Foreign Inward Remittance Guide 2026

COLA in 2026: How to Negotiate a Cost of Living Raise

Secure and Private